|
|
02-03-2024, 05:01 AM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
(He did not prevail)
|
02-03-2024, 05:14 AM
|
|
Forum gadfly
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In your head
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Just when I think this thread can't get any worse ...
... it gets worse
__________________
"Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, "Is it reasonable?""
- Richard P. Feynman
|
02-03-2024, 07:17 AM
|
Karma is Rael
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paradise Park
Gender: Bender
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
(He did not prevail)
|
If only he had been... EverLasting
Quote:
Originally Posted by -FX-
Just when I think this thread can't get any worse ...
... it gets worse
|
One, two, three
She's a real left winger 'cause she been down south
And held peasants in her arms
She said, "I can tell you stories that could make you cry"
"What about you?"
I said, "me too"
"I could tell you a story that would make you cry"
And she sighed, "aah"
|
02-03-2024, 12:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
it's just so weird because there are SO MANY ways you can verify how light works, and how projectors work, and so on
|
There is nothing contradictory here.
|
02-03-2024, 12:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
A camera works in the same way. For example, a snapshot of the sun exploding would get the same image because it would be taken in real time, not delayed time. If light has not reached earth yet, we would not be able to see each other nor would the camera produce an image, but it would capture an image of the sun exploding because enough light would be present.
Last edited by peacegirl; 02-03-2024 at 12:45 PM.
|
02-03-2024, 12:46 PM
|
|
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
After all the years people here spent educating you on how eyes and cameras work, and here you are, a total reset, babbling the same dumb, wrong, impossible shit.
But keep it up, you bring the In that respect you are a candle in the dark, the wind beneath our wings.
|
02-03-2024, 01:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
After all the years people here spent educating you on how eyes and cameras work, and here you are, a total reset, babbling the same dumb, wrong, impossible shit.
But keep it up, you bring the In that respect you are a candle in the dark, the wind beneath our wings.
|
You just can’t stand being wrong David. Your ad hominems reveal a lot about you. Your unbridled emotions have ruined it for everyone. There is nothing regarding how the eyes work that are being debated other than the observation that allow us to see the same image but in real time. I know this bothers you so much that you aren’t the others have no civility. Sad!
|
02-03-2024, 01:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Duplicate
Last edited by peacegirl; 02-03-2024 at 05:12 PM.
|
02-03-2024, 01:15 PM
|
|
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
After all the years people here spent educating you on how eyes and cameras work, and here you are, a total reset, babbling the same dumb, wrong, impossible shit.
But keep it up, you bring the In that respect you are a candle in the dark, the wind beneath our wings.
|
You just can’t stand being wrong David. Your ad hominems reveal a lot about you. Your unbridled emotions have ruined it for everyone. There is nothing regarding how the eyes work that are being debated other than the observation that allow us to see the same image but in real time. I know this bothers you so much that you and the others have no civility. Sad!
|
I thought LadyShea ruined it for everyone?
|
02-03-2024, 02:25 PM
|
|
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Classics in Idiot Nonsense Babble, I
I know you’re trying your best to understand this concept
The very second you talk about traveling, you are not taking into consideration the fact that, although photons get replaced, the lens is capturing the mirror image of the object instantly. That's why I keep saying that although light travels, the light or image that is captured on film is not light that has traveled through space and time; it is present as a reverse image, or negative, of the actual object. I know you're trying your best to understand this concept. — peacegirl, May 2012
|
02-03-2024, 02:59 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
|
02-03-2024, 03:21 PM
|
|
Spiffiest wanger
|
|
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
|
|
02-03-2024, 04:00 PM
|
|
Forum gadfly
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In your head
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
If only there was vast amount of scientific information on optics and light and shit like that
__________________
"Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, "Is it reasonable?""
- Richard P. Feynman
|
02-03-2024, 04:01 PM
|
|
Forum gadfly
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In your head
Gender: Male
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Until that day, we must listen to nobodies on the internet, to help us understand these things
__________________
"Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, "Is it reasonable?""
- Richard P. Feynman
|
02-03-2024, 04:04 PM
|
|
Flyover Hillbilly
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juggalonia
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
Sue the President over it, why don't you! (Seymour Lessans sued the President over the dog eyes)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
?!?
|
Here ya go, seebs. The Lessans family has been stealing taxpayer money for a very long time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
(He did not prevail)
|
Indeed.
__________________
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." ~ Louis D. Brandeis
"Psychos do not explode when sunlight hits them, I don't give a fuck how crazy they are." ~ S. Gecko
"What the fuck is a German muffin?" ~ R. Swanson
|
02-03-2024, 05:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Classics in Idiot Nonsense Babble, I
I know you’re trying your best to understand this concept
The very second you talk about traveling, you are not taking into consideration the fact that, although photons get replaced, the lens is capturing the mirror image of the object instantly. That's why I keep saying that although light travels, the light or image that is captured on film is not light that has traveled through space and time; it is present as a reverse image, or negative, of the actual object. I know you're trying your best to understand this concept. — peacegirl, May 2012
|
It’s not babble. The light is at the lens as long as the requirements of size and brightness are met. The image doesn’t change. The only thing that changes is whether the object viewed through the lens of a camera or the eye is in real time. This disturbs you greatly so you keep trying to hurt me!
|
02-03-2024, 05:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
|
|
That is true because the switch was not yet turned on until 12 noon. There was no Sun to see. This example is not the same as the sun exploding even before the 8 minutes. That’s how confused you all are! As I mentioned, the light reaching us 8 minutes later would allow us to see each other.
|
02-03-2024, 05:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by -FX-
Until that day, we must listen to nobodies on the internet, to help us understand these things
|
What a misguided judgment. But to your credit you hit the nail on the head. Anyone making extraordinary claims on the internet must be a crackpot, by definition. Why wasn’t this great discovery recognized by now? I know what you’re thinking. I really can’t blame you for thinking this way though. I’d be just as skeptical. It’s the cruelty here that is so disturbing.
|
02-03-2024, 07:30 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
|
02-03-2024, 07:35 PM
|
God Made Me A Skeptic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
huh that's weird
like, those look like they're almost the same passage, but one of them has been corrupted.
__________________
Hear me / and if I close my mind in fear / please pry it open
See me / and if my face becomes sincere / beware
Hold me / and when I start to come undone / stitch me together
Save me / and when you see me strut / remind me of what left this outlaw torn
|
02-03-2024, 09:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
|
That is accurate. We could not see each other for 8 minutes. It would be dark, but the Sun we would see because it’s bright enough and large enough to be seen. It meets the requirements. Proximity has nothing to do with it when time is not involved. One day you’ll wipe that smirk off your face!
|
02-03-2024, 09:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
huh that's weird
like, those look like they're almost the same passage, but one of them has been corrupted.
|
Wrong! They mean different things. He wrote both. They are not corrupted. You are being corrupted by Chuck. This place should be an experiment regarding how people follow others without any independent thought of their own.
Last edited by peacegirl; 02-03-2024 at 10:34 PM.
|
02-03-2024, 09:11 PM
|
|
liar in wolf's clothing
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Frequently about
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
|
02-03-2024, 09:17 PM
|
God Made Me A Skeptic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Minnesota
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Man, the Lessans estate should sue these people for besmirching his reputation with this edited book.
__________________
Hear me / and if I close my mind in fear / please pry it open
See me / and if my face becomes sincere / beware
Hold me / and when I start to come undone / stitch me together
Save me / and when you see me strut / remind me of what left this outlaw torn
|
02-03-2024, 09:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
|
|
Re: A revolution in thought
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckF
|
No contradiction. You all just keep thinking in terms of the image needing to travel through time in order for it to be at the eye. You can’t fathom how this could be right but that does not make it wrong.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 114 (0 members and 114 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 AM.
|
|
|
|