Drive by science

[fragment]

Basically, there's nothing so ignorant that Jerome will not say it for attention.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by fragment

Foucault pendulum - Wikipedia

Countdown to Jerome telling us that rotation isn't motion...

Strange it needs a electromagnet to make it work if its the motion of the earth.

Like I said, you guys will believe anything.

The hanging, driving and damping systems
Synchronizing pulses are transmitted by a coded radio link to the driving system.
The power to the electronics is supplied by a photovoltaic panel
and a storage lead accumulator.

1

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by fragment

It hasn't. Read the link. Names referring to the star as at the pole date back only to medieval times.

Nonsense, they are claiming measurements soo small that they can be accounted for in the differences in the atmosphere, or the margin within the lenses.

[Kamilah Hauptmann]

Originally Posted by fragment

Basically, there's nothing so ignorant that Jerome will not say it for attention.

Or distract from Flynn/Russia/Yates, just like when the Flynn thing broke suddenly Jerome was interested in random other things outside politics. If it was entirely about attention, a singularity of it could be generated in the anti-vax thread.

[Crumb]

Hey Jerome, why are there stars that can be seen from the Southern Hemisphere, but not from the Northern Hemisphere and vice versa?

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Crumb

Hey Jerome, why are there stars that can be seen from the Southern Hemisphere, but not from the Northern Hemisphere and vice versa?

We don't have unlimited eyesight. Perspective.

Its the same reason you can't see the end of the hallway here:

[Jerome]

Crumb, why is an electromagnetic need to make a Foucault pendulum work?

[Crumb]

Originally Posted by Jerome

We don't have unlimited eyesight. Perspective.

Its the same reason you can't see the end of the hallway here:

...

But that's not how the stars disappear. As you move south they disappear over the horizon they don't fade into a distance. And also (assuming you are using the model below or something like it for your flat earth) how do you explain the stars being the same between Australia and southern south America, when they are different in north America?

[Ari]

Originally Posted by Jerome

Its the same reason you can't see the end of the hallway here:

You can't see the end of the hallway because the resolution is too small, increase the photo resolution, boom, end of hallway. Back when more people shot large format film, some landscape artists would shoot a wide angle view of the landscape and then later zoom in to the negative to pick out detail shots. Too bad there's no mechanical way to increase our eyes resolution or to see in other wavelengths of light. Too bad indeed.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Ari

You can't see the end of the hallway because the resolution is too small, increase the photo resolution, boom, end of hallway.

Increase eyesight resolution, boom, you can see the southern stars from the northern hemisphere.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Crumb

As you move south they disappear over the horizon they don't fade into a distance.

The horizon. Please take some time and learn about perspective.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Jerome

Crumb, why is an electromagnetic need to make a Foucault pendulum work?

You guys ran away from this really quick. Its almost like you are avoiding it...

[Crumb]

Originally Posted by Jerome

Increase eyesight resolution, boom, you can see the southern stars from the northern hemisphere.

So if you have a good enough telescope you can see the northern sky from the south? You really believe that?

[Jerome]

Perspective. Learn how it works.

Its an observable testable repeatable phenomenon.

Its like real science and stuff.

[Ari]

It's too bad we dont have the technology and this stays speculation.
Can you explain perspective to us?

[Jerome]

We don't have any telescope technology that can see from one end of the earth to the other.

You are also discounting the atmosphere.

[Ari]

If we did have the technology where in the sky should we point this ocularis?

[Crumb]

Are you just not going to try to explain why I can see the same stars in Australia as South America?

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Jerome

So we have an honest to goodness "flat Earther" here, this should be very amusing to those who understand real science.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Crumb

Are you just not going to try to explain why I can see the same stars in Australia as South America?

I'm guessing that Jerome has never been to either place, he's spending too much time watching you tube video's about the flat Earth. Most of what those people offer as proof is laughably wrong, and easily explained by real science, that they deny.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Crumb

Are you just not going to try to explain why I can see the same stars in Australia as South America?

Think of it like a huge planetarium, sitting on the outside is the southern hemisphere, sitting on the inside is the northern hemisphere. Australia and South America would be on the opposite sides of the outside of the planetarium, the stars they would see would be the same.

[Jerome]

Originally Posted by Jerome

You guys ran away from this really quick. Its almost like you are avoiding it...

Looks like this one really blows away your 'evidence', so you just ignore it ... very scientific of you.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Jerome

You guys ran away from this really quick. Its almost like you are avoiding it...

The electromagnet overcomes the drag of the air, in a vacuum it wouldn't be necessary. The electromagnet just keeps the pendulum swinging, it doesn't determine the direction of the swing.

[thedoc]

Originally Posted by Jerome

Think of it like a huge planetarium, sitting on the outside is the southern hemisphere, sitting on the inside is the northern hemisphere. Australia and South America would be on the opposite sides of the outside of the planetarium, the stars they would see would be the same.

You really believe all that nonsense, don't you?

[Jerome]

lol

So the drag of the air is more powerful than the motion of the earth, but the drag of the air does not cause the motion, the earth does, and the electromagnet, much stronger than the motion of the earth and much stronger than the drag of the air, just makes it move .. but its the earth making it move .. or something .. in a direction.

Where the motion is started, of course, has absolutely no effect on its motion, of course ...

hahhahhhahhhhaah

!!!1!111!!1