A revolution in thought

[davidm]

The last seven consecutive posts at that iidb thread have been huge walls of copypasta by her.

[Stephen Maturin]

At this rate y'all are never going to get around to dog eyes, juicy cunts, warmed-over 1950s rape apologetics, perfectly cooked spaghetti and meatballs, or eternal life through pronoun usage.

[davidm]

Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin

At this rate y'all are never going to get around to dog eyes, juicy cunts, warmed-over 1950s rape apologetics, perfectly cooked spaghetti and meatballs, or eternal life through pronoun usage.

I know, right? I’m trying to decide whether to entice her in that direction, but at this point I actually feel kinda sorry for her, so I don’t know. I think it would pick up participation and lulz, though,

[Stephen Maturin]

Is that Trick Slattery guy still out there? Surely he could straighten out that mess over at IIDB.

show spoiler

[davidm]

Originally Posted by Stephen Maturin

Is that Trick Slattery guy still out there? Surely he could straighten out that mess over at IIDB.

show spoiler

That guy DBT over there was been quoting Trick’s dumbass bullshit. Peacegirl, meanwhile, is completely off the rails and everyone is ignoring the thread. I wonder if I should finally introduce the fun bits in the book?

[davidm]

Or maybe you and ChuckF should join the fun.

[davidm]

peacegirl has skipped on to light and sight now, with predictable results.

[ChuckF]

Hoo boy. Has she mentioned how 98% of homo-sexual intercourse comes into existence only because boys and girls are denied the opportunity to indulge with the opposite sex and fall in love?

[specious_reasons]

Originally Posted by davidm

peacegirl has skipped on to light and sight now, with predictable results.

I checked the thread, and it seems like it's mostly you at this point, maybe it's time to bail out. Nothing's going to change at this point.

[davidm]

Originally Posted by specious_reasons

I checked the thread, and it seems like it's mostly you at this point, maybe it's time to bail out. Nothing's going to change at this point.

Yeah, I know, I’m just trolling for lulz, between long stretches of work.

But it seems peacegirl has got herself in a bit of a pickle. She once again has been defending the daft claim that if God turned on the sun at noon, we on earth would see it instantly. Then she posted an excerpt of the passage from Lessans’ book.

Except — inadvertently? — she posted the passage fron the authentic text — of which, as we all know, ChuckF is the true steward. And of course it states just the opposite: that if God turned on the sun at noon, we would have to wait eight minutes to see it.

So I just posted side by side the two versions of the text that directly contradict each other.

[specious_reasons]

I eventually decided that I didn’t like how it felt debating peacegirl just for the lulz, and I think you came to a similar conclusion. That’s why I made that suggestion. Not judging, just pointing it out.

[davidm]

Originally Posted by specious_reasons

I eventually decided that I didn’t like how it felt debating peacegirl just for the lulz, and I think you came to a similar conclusion. That’s why I made that suggestion. Not judging, just pointing it out.

Yeah, I know, I started feeling guilty beating up on such an easy target. But to make up for that, I really wanted to help her, at iidb, formulate a clear statement of her argument, with premises and a conclusion. She completely rejected my advice and made all her usual awful mistakes. So it goes.