Go Back   Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > Philosophy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #17101  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:41 PM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXX
Images: 7
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
LadyShea, you're just as bad as Spacemonkey, you think you are more knowledgeable than you really are. It sucks.
It doesn't matter how bad I am or how much knowledge I lack, you still believe all of this on faith alone.
This is not about faith even though to you it seems that way based on a superficial analysis. And believe me, that's exactly what it is.
Superficial? Now that is funny. peacegirl, you are the one presenting Lessans. The superficiality is all yours.
Reply With Quote
  #17102  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:43 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if they are not true they will just keep us in a state of ignorance
LOL; we are studying the most fundamental aspects of the nature of the Universe with QM, exploring other planets with Rovers, exploring the outer solar system with probes, learning about other galaxies with the Hubble, learning about the microscopic world with increasingly sensitive optical technologies, etc. If that's ignorance, I'll take it over facial recognition in dogs.
Reply With Quote
  #17103  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:43 PM
Angakuk's Avatar
Angakuk Angakuk is offline
NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCCLXXXIII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Light that strikes an object splits up due to absorption, which allows the remaining non-absorbed light to reveal the object when we are within visual range of that object. This light is not static because it is constantly being replaced by new light, but it does not bounce off the object and travel. I don't know how else to explain it.
I know I have suggested this before, but I am going to try again. Go into a darkened room. Take a mirror and flashlight with you. Position the mirror so that it is facing a blank wall a foot or so distant from the mirror. Shine the flashlight at the mirror. Observe the spot of light that appears on the wall opposite the mirror. Then come back here and tell us that the light which was not absorbed by the mirror did not bounce off the surface of the mirror, travel across the room and strike the wall.
Have you tried this yet, peacegirl? If you have, what were the results?
I am actually not interested in hearing any more results that would prove Lessans wrong, not because I'm in denial, but because the test to prove him wrong, is inaccurate. When you talk about mirrors, do you actually think this proves Lessans wrong when I have said all along that mirrors are only a projection of what already exists? You really should be laughing at yourself Angakuk for spreading your wings in pride when you have nothing to be proud about.
I didn't say anything about trying to prove Lessans wrong. I described a simple experiment that you can do at home. The purpose of the experiment is to see whether or not non-absorbed light is reflected by an object. The object, in this instance, being a mirror.

Did you do the experiment? If you did, what were the results and how do you explain those results? If you didn't try it, why didn't you?
I don't have to do an experiment because I know what it will show. If an object is in the room when I look in a mirror the non-absorbed light will be reflected, but I will see the image in the mirror in real time. Just because light reflects off of a mirror doesn't negate the efferent model. Again, you're failing to see that what we are viewing in the mirror is a "mirror image" of the actual object that is in the room. Do you think the light would bring us the image if the object was no longer in the room? That's what science is actually stating when they say an event doesn't have to be present for the light to bring us the image, as if to say that light alone is the cause, not a condition, of sight.
The experiment has absolutely nothing to do with the presence of any other object in the room or looking in the mirror at all. Reread the description of the experiment, go and conduct it yourself, then come back and tell us what happened.
__________________
Old Pain In The Ass says: I am on a mission from God to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; to bring faith to the doubtful and doubt to the faithful. :shakebible:
Reply With Quote
  #17104  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:44 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post

Mad scientist Dr. Jules Poindexter


FOCUS ON SCIENCE

Report: Peacegirl Posts Exhibit 'Quantum Wave-Particle Stupidity'

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Mad scientists at Bell Laboratories confirmed Tuesday that an Internet message board user's posts exhibit "unprecedented and heretofore unsuspected wave-particle stupidity."

The dual nature of the posts by peacegirl, a participant at Freethought-Forum, was discovered by passing her posts through a classic two-slit detector.

"Even when we fired each post through the detector one at a time with both slits open, eventually the posts built up a waveform of stupidity on the detector on the other side, suggesting that prior to a measurement, the posts are in a superposition of stupidity, being stupid every possible way it is to be stupid," said the lead mad scientist for the study, Dr. Jules Poindexter.

Poindexter went on: "When the post strikes the screen, it creates a single, really stupid point, but over time the wave nature of the stupid manifests itself."

In nature, photons, electrons and even some macroscopic objects have been passed through the two-slit detector, and they always exhibit wave-particle duality. Previously it was not thought that message board posts could exhibit a similar wave-particle stupidity.

The experiment also confirmed that while the degree of stupidity of each post is inherently indeterministic, one can square the amplitude of the wave function and derive a high probability of how stupid each post will be.
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:
Reply With Quote
  #17105  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:46 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if they are not true they will just keep us in a state of ignorance
LOL; we are studying the most fundamental aspects of the nature of the Universe with QM, exploring other planets with Rovers, exploring the outer solar system with probes, learning about other galaxies with the Hubble, learning about the microscopic world with increasingly sensitive optical technologies, etc. If that's ignorance, I'll take it over facial recognition in dogs.
Um, and you don't call that downright arrogance LadyShea? Is studying facial recognition in dogs too beneath you?
Reply With Quote
  #17106  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:47 PM
Angakuk's Avatar
Angakuk Angakuk is offline
NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCCLXXXIII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:
As opposed to being run by ignorant pool hustlers and their crazy catlady daughters.

Tough choices all around, I agree.
__________________
Old Pain In The Ass says: I am on a mission from God to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; to bring faith to the doubtful and doubt to the faithful. :shakebible:
Reply With Quote
  #17107  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:47 PM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXX
Images: 7
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Ranger View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
I realize now that people don't want real time vision to be true which, I believe, has been the cause of such extreme emotional reactions.
As has been explained to you before, plenty of people -- including pretty-much the entire astronomical community -- would practically kill for the ability to see in "real time."


The problem is that every single experiment and observation conclusively demonstrates that we don't.
Really? I hope so because that's how we see. Spacemonkey is wrong in his analysis, pure and simple.
She has now explicitly stated that no matter what any test or experiment shows, and regardless of the fact that every single one of them show Lessans to be wrong, Lessans is right anyway. And, with that, why would anyone continue on with this? Every time you describe another experiment that conclusively disproves Lessans, and everytime you lead her through the chain of her own reasoning that ends in self-contradiction or gibberish, she will simply go into reset mode, and pronounce Lessans to be right.
Where have you been davidm? She's been ignoring contradictory evidence since post 1 thread 1. One of the amazing aspects of this thread is the number of posters who just can't get over it. The only real topic of this thread is peacegirls mental illness.
Reply With Quote
  #17108  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:50 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Light that strikes an object splits up due to absorption, which allows the remaining non-absorbed light to reveal the object when we are within visual range of that object. This light is not static because it is constantly being replaced by new light, but it does not bounce off the object and travel. I don't know how else to explain it.
I know I have suggested this before, but I am going to try again. Go into a darkened room. Take a mirror and flashlight with you. Position the mirror so that it is facing a blank wall a foot or so distant from the mirror. Shine the flashlight at the mirror. Observe the spot of light that appears on the wall opposite the mirror. Then come back here and tell us that the light which was not absorbed by the mirror did not bounce off the surface of the mirror, travel across the room and strike the wall.
Have you tried this yet, peacegirl? If you have, what were the results?
I am actually not interested in hearing any more results that would prove Lessans wrong, not because I'm in denial, but because the test to prove him wrong, is inaccurate. When you talk about mirrors, do you actually think this proves Lessans wrong when I have said all along that mirrors are only a projection of what already exists? You really should be laughing at yourself Angakuk for spreading your wings in pride when you have nothing to be proud about.
I didn't say anything about trying to prove Lessans wrong. I described a simple experiment that you can do at home. The purpose of the experiment is to see whether or not non-absorbed light is reflected by an object. The object, in this instance, being a mirror.

Did you do the experiment? If you did, what were the results and how do you explain those results? If you didn't try it, why didn't you?
I don't have to do an experiment because I know what it will show. If an object is in the room when I look in a mirror the non-absorbed light will be reflected, but I will see the image in the mirror in real time. Just because light reflects off of a mirror doesn't negate the efferent model. Again, you're failing to see that what we are viewing in the mirror is a "mirror image" of the actual object that is in the room. Do you think the light would bring us the image if the object was no longer in the room? That's what science is actually stating when they say an event doesn't have to be present for the light to bring us the image, as if to say that light alone is the cause, not a condition, of sight.
The experiment has absolutely nothing to do with the presence of any other object in the room or looking in the mirror at all. Reread the description of the experiment, go and conduct it yourself, then come back and tell us what happened.
I know that non-absorbed light will be at the wall Angakuk, but this has nothing to do with EFFERENT VISION. No one seems to grasp the significance of this model in changing what it is we are looking at and why light alone cannot bring an image to us when there is no object in one's field of view.
Reply With Quote
  #17109  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:54 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:
As opposed to being run by ignorant pool hustlers and their crazy catlady daughters.

Tough choices all around, I agree.
I see you have decided to join the stupidity bandwagon along with your fellow cronies. You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left. I guess not. :sadcheer:
Reply With Quote
  #17110  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:55 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if they are not true they will just keep us in a state of ignorance
LOL; we are studying the most fundamental aspects of the nature of the Universe with QM, exploring other planets with Rovers, exploring the outer solar system with probes, learning about other galaxies with the Hubble, learning about the microscopic world with increasingly sensitive optical technologies, etc. If that's ignorance, I'll take it over facial recognition in dogs.
Um, and you don't call that downright arrogance LadyShea? Is studying facial recognition in dogs too beneath you?
LOL, not at all. I have read several studies of it in fact and it's quite fascinating.

However, I don't think it's more important than all the Displays of Ignorance listed.
Reply With Quote
  #17111  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:56 PM
peacegirl's Avatar
peacegirl peacegirl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: U.S.A.
Gender: Female
Posts: XXMVCDLXXX
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if they are not true they will just keep us in a state of ignorance
LOL; we are studying the most fundamental aspects of the nature of the Universe with QM, exploring other planets with Rovers, exploring the outer solar system with probes, learning about other galaxies with the Hubble, learning about the microscopic world with increasingly sensitive optical technologies, etc. If that's ignorance, I'll take it over facial recognition in dogs.
Um, and you don't call that downright arrogance LadyShea? Is studying facial recognition in dogs too beneath you?
LOL, not at all. I have read several studies of it in fact and it's quite fascinating.

However, I don't think it's more important than all the Displays of Ignorance listed.
The verdict is not in, just remember that.
Reply With Quote
  #17112  
Old 05-22-2012, 07:32 PM
LadyShea's Avatar
LadyShea LadyShea is offline
I said it, so I feel it, dick
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here
Posts: XXXMDCCCXCVII
Images: 41
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Lessans has been weighed. Lessans has been measured. Lessans has been found wanting.*

Just remember that.




*credit A Knight's Tale
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
davidm (05-22-2012)
  #17113  
Old 05-22-2012, 07:32 PM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXX
Images: 7
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl
if they are not true they will just keep us in a state of ignorance
LOL; we are studying the most fundamental aspects of the nature of the Universe with QM, exploring other planets with Rovers, exploring the outer solar system with probes, learning about other galaxies with the Hubble, learning about the microscopic world with increasingly sensitive optical technologies, etc. If that's ignorance, I'll take it over facial recognition in dogs.
Um, and you don't call that downright arrogance LadyShea? Is studying facial recognition in dogs too beneath you?
LOL, not at all. I have read several studies of it in fact and it's quite fascinating.

However, I don't think it's more important than all the Displays of Ignorance listed.
The verdict is not in, just remember that.
peacegirl, you are the only person in the world that thinks that, but everyone knows that you are insane.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
LadyShea (05-22-2012), Spacemonkey (05-22-2012)
  #17114  
Old 05-22-2012, 07:52 PM
thedoc's Avatar
thedoc thedoc is offline
I'm Deplorable.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: XMMCCCXCVI
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:

Well they probably have a lot to be angry about with people like Lessans trying to upset their neat little 'statis quo'.
Reply With Quote
  #17115  
Old 05-22-2012, 07:55 PM
thedoc's Avatar
thedoc thedoc is offline
I'm Deplorable.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: XMMCCCXCVI
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:
As opposed to being run by ignorant pool hustlers and their crazy catlady daughters.

Tough choices all around, I agree.
I see you have decided to join the stupidity bandwagon along with your fellow cronies. You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left. I guess not. :sadcheer:
Sometimes it's not how many brain cells you have, it's whether they are working or not.
Reply With Quote
  #17116  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:02 PM
thedoc's Avatar
thedoc thedoc is offline
I'm Deplorable.
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: XMMCCCXCVI
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
The verdict is not in, just remember that.
Only you are still outstanding, most likely in a cowpatty.
Reply With Quote
  #17117  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:07 PM
But's Avatar
But But is offline
This is the title that appears beneath your name on your posts.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: MVDCCCLXXIV
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturalist.atheist View Post
These notions of "teleportation" often used when talking about quantum entanglement rely on the assumption that at the sub-atomic level, particles are characterized by a relatively small number of measurements. So in the case of a photon (light) that would be polarization, phase and frequency. Just three properties. So two photons that had equal values for these three measurements would be considered to be identical (at least until we learn how to read the serial numbers ;)).
Observables, not measurements.
Reply With Quote
  #17118  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:17 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Spiffiest wanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCXCI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: A revolution in thought


Angakuk on the Stupidity Bandwagon, playing the tuba at far right. The wagon is traveling down a fiberoptic cable on teh Internets.

MESSAGE-BOARD POSTERS IN PERSPECTIVE

Report: Angakuk Joins Stupidity Bandwagon

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Angakuk has joined the stupidity bandwagon, it was confirmed Tuesday.

"It's true," the message-board poster at Freethought-Forum.com said in an e-mail interview. "I'm all on board with the stupid. I'm in it to win it with my cronies."

Angakuk, who in addition to posting messages at the Freethought-Forum message board is also a NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack, said that he is now "playing the Boob Tuba" on the Stupidity Bandwagon.

"Oom-pah-pah, oom-pah-pah," Agnaugk said.

Another poster at the board, peacegirl, expressed disappointment at Angauk's decision to hop on board the Wagon of Witlessness.

"You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left," peacegirl said. "I guess not. :sadcheer: "

Last edited by davidm; 05-22-2012 at 08:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Angakuk (05-22-2012), The Man (09-23-2012)
  #17119  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:19 PM
naturalist.atheist naturalist.atheist is offline
Reality Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: VMMCXXX
Images: 7
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post

Mad scientist Dr. Jules Poindexter


FOCUS ON SCIENCE

Report: Peacegirl Posts Exhibit 'Quantum Wave-Particle Stupidity'

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Mad scientists at Bell Laboratories confirmed Tuesday that an Internet message board user's posts exhibit "unprecedented and heretofore unsuspected wave-particle stupidity."

The dual nature of the posts by peacegirl, a participant at Freethought-Forum, was discovered by passing her posts through a classic two-slit detector.

"Even when we fired each post through the detector one at a time with both slits open, eventually the posts built up a waveform of stupidity on the detector on the other side, suggesting that prior to a measurement, the posts are in a superposition of stupidity, being stupid every possible way it is to be stupid," said the lead mad scientist for the study, Dr. Jules Poindexter.

Poindexter went on: "When the post strikes the screen, it creates a single, really stupid point, but over time the wave nature of the stupid manifests itself."

In nature, photons, electrons and even some macroscopic objects have been passed through the two-slit detector, and they always exhibit wave-particle duality. Previously it was not thought that message board posts could exhibit a similar wave-particle stupidity.

The experiment also confirmed that while the degree of stupidity of each post is inherently indeterministic, one can square the amplitude of the wave function and derive a high probability of how stupid each post will be.
This is exactly why our world is in the state it's in. It's being run by mad scientists!!! :eek::eek::eek:
peacegirl, only an actual mad person insists that everyone else is mad.
Reply With Quote
  #17120  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:29 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Spiffiest wanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCXCI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: A revolution in thought

I thought peacegirl said Lessans' claim are not in conflict with science. Now they are? :eek:
Reply With Quote
  #17121  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:35 PM
Angakuk's Avatar
Angakuk Angakuk is offline
NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCCLXXXIII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post

Angakuk on the Stupidity Bandwagon, playing the tuba at far right. The wagon is traveling down a fiberoptic cable on teh Internets.

MESSAGE-BOARD POSTERS IN PERSPECTIVE

Report: Angakuk Joins Stupidity Bandwagon

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Angakuk has joined the stupidity bandwagon, it was confirmed Tuesday.

"It's true," the message-board poster at Freethought-Forum.com said in an e-mail interview. "I'm all on board with the stupid. I'm in it to win it with my cronies."

Angakuk, who in addition to posting messages at the Freethought-Forum message board is also a NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack, said that he is now "playing the Boob Tuba" on the Stupidity Bandwagon.

"Oom-pah-pah, oom-pah-pah," Agnaugk said.

Another poster at the board, peacegirl, expressed disappointment at Angauk's decision to hop on board the Wagon of Witlessness.

"You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left," peacegirl said. "I guess not. :sadcheer: "
Thanks for the tuba. I always wanted to play one but could never afford the lessons, or the tuba. There are some who say that I don't need to bother with the tuba. They say I have plenty of brass as it is.

Also, in the course of 3 successive sentences you managed to spell my name three different ways, only one of which was correct. That is pretty impressive.
__________________
Old Pain In The Ass says: I am on a mission from God to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; to bring faith to the doubtful and doubt to the faithful. :shakebible:
Reply With Quote
  #17122  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:36 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Spiffiest wanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCXCI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post

Angakuk on the Stupidity Bandwagon, playing the tuba at far right. The wagon is traveling down a fiberoptic cable on teh Internets.

MESSAGE-BOARD POSTERS IN PERSPECTIVE

Report: Angakuk Joins Stupidity Bandwagon

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Angakuk has joined the stupidity bandwagon, it was confirmed Tuesday.

"It's true," the message-board poster at Freethought-Forum.com said in an e-mail interview. "I'm all on board with the stupid. I'm in it to win it with my cronies."

Angakuk, who in addition to posting messages at the Freethought-Forum message board is also a NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack, said that he is now "playing the Boob Tuba" on the Stupidity Bandwagon.

"Oom-pah-pah, oom-pah-pah," Agnaugk said.

Another poster at the board, peacegirl, expressed disappointment at Angauk's decision to hop on board the Wagon of Witlessness.

"You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left," peacegirl said. "I guess not. :sadcheer: "
Thanks for the tuba. I always wanted to play one but could never afford the lessons, or the tuba. There are some who say that I don't need to bother with the tuba. They say I have plenty of brass as it is.

Also, in the course of 3 successive sentences you managed to spell my name three different ways, only one of which was correct. That is pretty impressive.
I'm not an editor for nothing. :D
Reply With Quote
  #17123  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:40 PM
Angakuk's Avatar
Angakuk Angakuk is offline
NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCCLXXXIII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by peacegirl View Post
Light that strikes an object splits up due to absorption, which allows the remaining non-absorbed light to reveal the object when we are within visual range of that object. This light is not static because it is constantly being replaced by new light, but it does not bounce off the object and travel. I don't know how else to explain it.
I know I have suggested this before, but I am going to try again. Go into a darkened room. Take a mirror and flashlight with you. Position the mirror so that it is facing a blank wall a foot or so distant from the mirror. Shine the flashlight at the mirror. Observe the spot of light that appears on the wall opposite the mirror. Then come back here and tell us that the light which was not absorbed by the mirror did not bounce off the surface of the mirror, travel across the room and strike the wall.
Have you tried this yet, peacegirl? If you have, what were the results?
I am actually not interested in hearing any more results that would prove Lessans wrong, not because I'm in denial, but because the test to prove him wrong, is inaccurate. When you talk about mirrors, do you actually think this proves Lessans wrong when I have said all along that mirrors are only a projection of what already exists? You really should be laughing at yourself Angakuk for spreading your wings in pride when you have nothing to be proud about.
I didn't say anything about trying to prove Lessans wrong. I described a simple experiment that you can do at home. The purpose of the experiment is to see whether or not non-absorbed light is reflected by an object. The object, in this instance, being a mirror.

Did you do the experiment? If you did, what were the results and how do you explain those results? If you didn't try it, why didn't you?
I don't have to do an experiment because I know what it will show. If an object is in the room when I look in a mirror the non-absorbed light will be reflected, but I will see the image in the mirror in real time. Just because light reflects off of a mirror doesn't negate the efferent model. Again, you're failing to see that what we are viewing in the mirror is a "mirror image" of the actual object that is in the room. Do you think the light would bring us the image if the object was no longer in the room? That's what science is actually stating when they say an event doesn't have to be present for the light to bring us the image, as if to say that light alone is the cause, not a condition, of sight.
The experiment has absolutely nothing to do with the presence of any other object in the room or looking in the mirror at all. Reread the description of the experiment, go and conduct it yourself, then come back and tell us what happened.
I know that non-absorbed light will be at the wall Angakuk, but this has nothing to do with EFFERENT VISION.
But it does have a great deal to do with whether or not non-absorbed light is reflected by the object.

So, did you conduct the experiment? If you did, what were the results?
__________________
Old Pain In The Ass says: I am on a mission from God to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; to bring faith to the doubtful and doubt to the faithful. :shakebible:
Reply With Quote
  #17124  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:41 PM
Angakuk's Avatar
Angakuk Angakuk is offline
NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa
Gender: Male
Posts: MXCCCLXXXIII
Default Re: A revolution in thought

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angakuk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidm View Post

Angakuk on the Stupidity Bandwagon, playing the tuba at far right. The wagon is traveling down a fiberoptic cable on teh Internets.

MESSAGE-BOARD POSTERS IN PERSPECTIVE

Report: Angakuk Joins Stupidity Bandwagon

FREETHOUGHT-FORUM.COM (Internet News Service) -- Angakuk has joined the stupidity bandwagon, it was confirmed Tuesday.

"It's true," the message-board poster at Freethought-Forum.com said in an e-mail interview. "I'm all on board with the stupid. I'm in it to win it with my cronies."

Angakuk, who in addition to posting messages at the Freethought-Forum message board is also a NeoTillichian Hierophant & Partisan Hack, said that he is now "playing the Boob Tuba" on the Stupidity Bandwagon.

"Oom-pah-pah, oom-pah-pah," Agnaugk said.

Another poster at the board, peacegirl, expressed disappointment at Angauk's decision to hop on board the Wagon of Witlessness.

"You were one of the few that I thought had a few brain cells left," peacegirl said. "I guess not. :sadcheer: "
Thanks for the tuba. I always wanted to play one but could never afford the lessons, or the tuba. There are some who say that I don't need to bother with the tuba. They say I have plenty of brass as it is.

Also, in the course of 3 successive sentences you managed to spell my name three different ways, only one of which was correct. That is pretty impressive.
I'm not an editor for nothing. :D
You should be.
__________________
Old Pain In The Ass says: I am on a mission from God to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable; to bring faith to the doubtful and doubt to the faithful. :shakebible:
Reply With Quote
  #17125  
Old 05-22-2012, 08:47 PM
davidm's Avatar
davidm davidm is offline
Spiffiest wanger
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: MXCXCI
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: A revolution in thought

*Refusing to cash next paycheck.* :noway:
Reply With Quote
Thanks, from:
Angakuk (05-23-2012)
Reply

  Freethought Forum > The Marketplace > Philosophy


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 49 (0 members and 49 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.35935 seconds with 16 queries