Quote:
Originally Posted by viscousmemories
With all due respect I don't know how you could possibly make that argument unless you are in very different bubble than the one many Arab-Americans are in.
|
Because the Democrats are not actually stopping any [death][genocide][The Crusades] caused by any USA [bullets][guns][policies][imperialism] yet?
Because the Democrats also seem to never identify the [past collaborations][UK and US imperialist colonialist policy][future] of the "State of Israel" at all?
Israel, the State, is a theocracy, but no one says so, out loud?
Call me crazy, but, maybe there are reasons why many Western-civ folks have no problem with genocide or theocracy yet?
Maybe some of them are doing it for the money, like PA Senator John Fetterman said he was doing it for, in the news, when he mocked and trolled people who wanted him to stop genocide? The Major Donors matter more? Hm. hm...
Is "Radical Islam - I mean, Islam - " what the taxpayers and their elected representatives are fighting against? If not, then, what? Hm. Have any Muslims been displaced, or killed? At all? Has any money been spent on it?
Maybe some folks chose to vote for, volunteer for, and donate to Democrats, expecting a change, or hoping for a change?
Maybe some folks voted for a Democratic President who ran on a platform of hope and change, who, later, openly declined to suppot his own party's candidate for Governor of the State of New Jersey? In favor of the Republican?
And all of the NJ Dems also declined to support their own party's candidate for Gov of NJ? Except for the mayor of Fort Lee, NJ? Only one lady died, so, it was okay. Bridgegate was hardly a scandal.
Sorry if I sound jaded or bitter. I dislike genocide. But, I'm crazy, so, eh.