Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
No, I realize that I didn't know all of the conversations my father had.
|
And we have said from the beginning that the imaginary dialog was problematic. You responded several times that he actually had every single conversation reported in the book. You have no evidence of that,
you believe it on faith.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peacegirl
You are ruining it not just for others, but for yourself. You are losing this battle. I hope you give it up because you will never understand this knowledge otherwise. I am asking you, temporarily, to stop judging this work by your method of proof. I hope you can do that because so much is relying on you to acknowledge that he may be right for others to want to follow your lead.
|
How many times are you going to use this tired old butthurt?
I cannot "ruin it" for anyone, nobody is going to "follow my lead", I am not being relied upon to acknowledge anything, this is not a popularity contest and I am nobody's boss, guru, or leader.
So, are you done ad homming and using diversionary tactics? Do you plan to refute my points on the circularity and meaninglessness of the "movement in the direction of greater satisfaction" argument rationally? How about the non incompatibility of several forms of determinism?
I thought you wanted to discuss the principles...why do you let yourself get led down these paths?