Matal v. Tam
Asian dude started a band, named it The Slants, and tried to get the name trademarked. The U.S. Patent and Trademark denied the application pursuant to a statute prohibiting registration of a trademark that could "disparage . . . or bring . . . into contemp[t] or disrepute" any "persons, living or dead."
The Supreme Court (8-0, Gorsuch not participating) affirmed a federal court of appeals decision holding that the statute violated the Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Along the way the Court rejected the government's argument that trademarks are a form of government speech and held that the statute was unconstitutional even if characterized a regulation of "commercial speech."
----------
The Court also agreed to review
this case, in which a panel of three federal district court judges ruled (2-1) that the 2011 Wisconsin redistricting law was unconstitutional political gerrymandering. This could be the case where the Court decides that partisan gerrymandering cases are wholly nonjusticiable, or (more likely) generate a badly fractured decision essentially holding that there may be some circumstances in which judicial relief might be available in such cases, but this ain't one of 'em.